So it is Friday… and the latest version of #FollowFriday blog post hit the rails this morning from WordStream.com. Those guys do a great job there of bringing to the forefront issues that companies should be conscious about. Today’s food nugget for thought that I latched onto pertains to social media ownership and specifically, Twitter. Below is the blurb I want to address from WordStream.com’s blog.

Another interesting topic this week was well summarized by Search Engine Journal’s Glenn Gabe (@glenngabe) entitled “Lawyers, Guns, and Twitter – Who Owns Your Twitter Account.”  This was written on the heels of a Business Week survey that showed a disparity between c-level executives and employees on the topic of social media ownership.  While “60% of c-level executives believe they have a right to know how their employees represent themselves and their companies on social networking sites, 53% of employees believe their activities on social networking sites should be of no concern to employers” according to the survey. Combining Gabe’s own experience as a marketing consultant and social media participant with the legal opinion of Mike Pisauro, we have a while to go before this becomes a black and white issue (Grey Hat Tweeting, anyone?).

As you may expect, the proper course of action is related to various factors such as Twitter equity, company expectation and job description.  For the lucky ones out there, the answer can be found in your SNEA.

For the rest of us, it depends on the situation.  Your choices and recommended actions are summarized below. Which one do you fall under? Be careful which one you choose, especially if you’re tweeting on company time!

1) A Grandfathered Twitter Account: You had an existing Twitter account when you joined the company and Tweeting was not listed as a core responsibility

• Verdict: Twitter account belongs to you

2) A Grandfathered Twitter Account PLUS Job Responsibility:  Same as above with the caveat that employee has agreed to use his or her Twitter account to help promote the company

• Verdict: Check your SNEA or consider slicing followers depending on when they started following you (if they started to follow you before the job, they’re yours, if it happened after your hire, they’re the companies)

3) Work-Related Twitter Account: Employee sets up a personal Twitter account at request the of company to help promote said company

• Verdict: Twitter account belongs to company

4) Social Media Marketer Account: The Twitter account was set up upon hire as the Social Media Marketer for the company and doesn’t have its own equity

• Verdict: Account belongs to the company

5) Social Media Marketer PLUS Existing Account: If your Twitter account existed before you joined the company, but you were hired specifically as the company’s Social Media Marketer, the outcome may be different from option above

• Verdict: Twitter account belongs to you assuming company didn’t make specific request to buy your Twitter account upon hire

David Leonhardt followed up with a post that said the above scenarios neglect to ask whose name the Twitter account is in, and that may make things even more confusing.

Bottom line, says David, in who owns your Twitter account?  Answer: Twitter does.  

So the question I want to pose is thus:  Where is the line?  I see a hundred tweets a day from individuals who are using their Twitter accounts to represent a business, who post tweets telling the universe that they just saw a great home run at the local baseball game. Shouldn’t we then consider the true purpose of entities like Twitter to be to develop relations in general?  If so, are we now considering our Twitter network to be nothing more than an extensive contact list that becomes the intellectual property of our companies?  If that is the case, leaving a company and leaving your Twitter network behind certainly could start to feel like a divorce, where everything is divided up… like friends.

Thoughts?

In a blog post this morning on Search Engine Watch, Mark Jackson came REALLY close to tweeting about Search Twitter’s importance in the search world. ( View Mark’s post here ) He addressed the major differences between what Google is presenting in search, including blog results, news and press release results, product results, maps, etc., and Twitter’s search, which brings to light a more real time search focused on what people are looking for RIGHT NOW, rather than yesterday.

I wanted to comment today on the convention of revolution, as this fits in with what we keep seeing with Twitter and upstart search engines across the internet.

Jackson’s title referred to Twitter as a Google Killer, though he did clarify he does not think that Twitter will truly challenge Google. But the challenging of Google is where I want to focus.

Take a walk with me…

It seems that there are always a ton of dissenters – or revolutionists – who wish to see our greatest available tools fail. Years ago, it was the dethroning of Yahoo!, at the hands of the upstart Google, that was the shot heard around the virtual world launching the search revolution. Like governments around the world, populations are always happy at the fall of the evil regime and eager to place some other power hungry monger in the fallen government’s place, be they dressed like saviors.

As history shows us, it is not long before there is new discontent among the people and soon every new power hungry monger thinks they can challenge the ruler. The ruler is no longer able to provide services as they had in the past, like 100% uptime on free web based email and free statistics with no loss of data or search completely free of spam.

So what???

Clearly, the trail that Google has blazed is now filling in behind them with weeds. Clearly there are others out there who THINK they can do IT better than Google. But no one provides the whole package like Google. No one knows the full extent of “IT”. Google headed the original search revolution and opened all of the world’s eye to internet search possibility. Google’s reach has gone far beyond just search.

Let these upstarts continue to believe they can assassinate Google. Let the people believe these upstarts can offer something better. If all the services Google really provides come tumbling down, lets see which upstart can pick up the pieces. It won’t be Twitter or WolframAlpha. There is much more to providing a good search portal and algorithm then being mentioned on NPR or getting tweets that Johnny Depp just bought a latte. More importantly, until there is catastrophic failure (not just something identified by a whale) with the status quo, there just isn’t a reason for revolution.